Skip to content
Runs in:FranceMade in:United States

Archived

This model has been discontinued by the provider. Historical data is preserved.

No longer available since June 28, 2026.

OVH AI Endpoints (GRA)

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Tokonomix Editorial Team·Reviewed by Mes Kalkan··
Section 01

Speed analysis

Latency measured across all benchmark runs. P50 (median) and P95 (95th percentile) give a realistic picture of response speed under normal and peak load.

P50 latency (median)P95 latency23 runs
15788615758236293150006-2206-28ms
Section 02

Pricing history

Direct provider rates per million tokens, plus a typical-conversation cost estimate.

💰
API rates — Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
$0.1000 per 1M input tokens
$0.1000 per 1M output tokens
≈ <$0.0001 per typical conversation (800 tokens)
Input vs output price (per 1M tokens)
per 1M input tokens$0.1000
per 1M output tokens$0.1000

Pricing over time

Input & output per 1M tokens · step-line = price changes

$0.1000

input / 1M

— stable

$0.1000

output / 1M

— stable

2026-06-142026-06-142026-06-21
Input
Output
Price change
⟳ synced weekly
Section 03

Tokens per second

Throughput in tokens per second, derived from measured P50 latency. Higher is better; fluctuations track provider-side load.

Throughput (tokens / s)11111 / avg 5342
1294246

Estimated from P50 latency × 200 output tokens — the absolute number depends on this assumption; the trend is what matters.

Section 04

Capabilities

ownedBy: meta-llama
Section 05

Availability

Availability

No measurements yet

We haven't recorded enough API calls to show availability stats for this model. Data appears once the model starts receiving live traffic.

Section 06

Tokonomix benchmark verdicts

⚖️
Endorsed by 1 judge
Independent LLM judges evaluated this model on our weekly intelligence tests
claude-sonnet-4-586/100 · 23 runs
15 correct7 partial1 wrong65% accuracy
2026-06-21

Quality drops 29 points as performance degrades across all categories

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct by OVH AI Endpoints has experienced a significant decline in performance this benchmark window. The overall quality score plummeted from 99.0 to 70.3, representing a 28.7-point drop that affects the model's competitive standing. The degradation is evident across all measured categories, with factual accuracy scoring just 57, reasoning at 74, and multilingual capabilities at 80. This contrasts sharply with the previous window where coding achieved 100, multilingual scored 97, and reasoning reached 100. The current window shows a different category composition, making direct comparisons complex, but the overall trend is unmistakably negative. On a positive note, latency has improved slightly from 9119ms to 7942ms at the median, offering users marginally faster response times. However, this speed gain is overshadowed by the substantial quality regression. Testing consistency remains stable with five runs in both windows. Users relying on this endpoint should be aware of the current performance limitations, particularly for fact-dependent tasks where the model now scores below 60. The cause of this regression warrants investigation to determine whether it stems from infrastructure changes, model configuration, or other factors.

Quality

70.3

Latency p50

7,942 ms

Test runs

5

Quality dropped 29 points Factual accuracy now only 57 Latency improved to 7942ms Reasoning declined significantly
Last automated test
Jun 28, 2026 · 05:12 UTC · Benchmark
P50 latency
P95 latency
Errors
1 / 6 runs
Last reviewed by Tokonomix Team·June 28, 2026